A Systematic Review of Social Communication and Interaction Interventions for Patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder

• Published in: Scandinavian journal of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology Vol. 3; no. 3; pp. 147 - 168
• Main Authors: Hirvikoski, Tatja, Jonsson, Ulf, Halldner, Linda, Lundequist, Aiko, de Schipper, Elles, Nordin, Viviann, Bölte, Sven
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Sciendo 01.05.2015; Exeley Inc
• Subjects: Autism spectrum disorder; intervention; pervasive developmental disorder; review; therapy; treatment; treatment; pervasive developmental disorder; intervention; therapy; review; Autism spectrum disorder
• ISSN: 2245-8875; 2245-8875
• DOI: 10.21307/sjcapp-2015-016

Abstract Background: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is currently not curable, but it may be malleable to varying degrees in response to different interventions to improve outcomes. Objective: We conducted a systematic review of interventions aimed at ameliorating social communication impairments in patients with ASD. This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (no. CRD42013003780). Methods: We focused on the ASD interventions that are frequently applied in Swedish clincial practice to address ASD. To ensure stakeholder involvement, we also conducted two surveys with three major Swedish ASD interest organizations to assess perceived research priorities for ASD treatment. With the use of this rationale for selection, Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention [EIBI], Treatment and Education of Autistic and Related Communication Handicapped Children [TEACCH], social skills training groups, and interventions that involved significant others were reviewed. A bibliographic search was conducted via five databases: Medline, PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and ERIC. Identified articles were screened for relevance by two independent reviewers, who also assessed the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials using systematic checklists. Results: A total of 7264 citations were identified as being published before February 2013, and 109 studies (18 of EIBI, 18 of social skills training, 4 of TEACCH, and 69 of interventions involving significant others) were included in the analysis. The included studies provided some support for the positive effects of each of the interventions; this is especially true if the most recently published research (March 2013 through August 2015) is considered, and a crude updated search for relevant randomized controlled trials was performed. The interventions that involve the significant others of individuals with ASD form a heterogenous area of treatment strategies that require subcategorization for future review. Conclusions: These findings provide preliminary support for treatments that are commonly used in clinical practice for the treatment of ASD in Sweden. However, larger and more rigorously designed and controlled studies are still needed before definitive conclusions regarding their effects can be made.