Ergonomic risk assessment during massage among physiotherapists: Introduction of generic postures notion

• Published in: Work (Reading, Mass.) Vol. 75; no. 3; p. 1021
• Main Authors: Jacquier-Bret, Julien, Gorce, Philippe, Rouvière, Emilie
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands 01.01.2023
• Subjects: Ergonomics - methods; Humans; Massage; Musculoskeletal Diseases - epidemiology; Musculoskeletal Diseases - etiology; Musculoskeletal Diseases - prevention & control; Occupational Diseases - epidemiology; Occupational Diseases - etiology; Occupational Diseases - prevention & control; Physical Therapists; Posture - physiology; Risk Assessment - methods; musculoskeletal disorders; Physiotherapist; massage; posture; RULA
• ISSN: 1875-9270
• DOI: 10.3233/wor-220192

Musculoskeletal disorders are prevalent among physiotherapists. They perform many repetitive tasks in awkward postures that require a high muscle load. This issue was often addressed through subjective analysis (questionnaire) but rarely using postural evaluation combined with an ergonomic assessment. The aim of this article was to decompose draining lymphatic massage performed by physiotherapists in generic postures (GP) to quickly assess the musculoskeletal disorder risk. Based on numeric video recorded in frontal and sagittal planes, 3360 postures were defined from 20-minutes lymphatic drainage massage performed by 7 physiotherapists over a period of 6 months. A hierarchical cluster analysis was applied to define the GP. Seven GP were identified, which were described by their average joint angles, variability and relative frequency. GP6, GP4 and GP2 had the highest frequencies (17.6%, 16.9% and 16.8% respectively). Trunk and neck were essentially flexed (neck: 17.0±10.0° for GP1; trunk: 20.4±8.7° for GP4). Shoulder flexion and abduction ranged from 15° (GP7) to 60° (GP4). Mean and variability of RULA score completed the analysis. The highest scores were computed for GP2 and GP3 (respectively 5.5±1.3 and 5.8±1.2, p < 0.05). GP4 had the lowest (4.0±1.1, p < 0.05). The results suggest that massages have to be monitored. Attention should be paid to the postures used to prevent the occurrence of MSDs. The massages could be described as a combination of generic posture for a rapid ergonomic assessment.