Difference in demographics and motivation to study medicine with respect to medical students' channel of admission: A national study

Medical schools employ various tools to select suitable medical students (MS). This study investigated whether MS who were admitted through multiple mini-interviews (MMI) and MS who were admitted through Taiwan's Joint College Entrance Written Test (JCEWT) differed in their characteristics. Fir...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedical teacher Vol. 43; no. 9; pp. 1025 - 1030
Main Authors Lin, Chyi-Her, Chen, Mei-Hua, Tsai, Tsuen-Chiuan, Huang, Williams J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis 02.09.2021
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Medical schools employ various tools to select suitable medical students (MS). This study investigated whether MS who were admitted through multiple mini-interviews (MMI) and MS who were admitted through Taiwan's Joint College Entrance Written Test (JCEWT) differed in their characteristics. First-year MS from seven medical schools completed a semi-structured questionnaire that inquired into their channel of admission (MMI or JCEWT), gender, location (metropolitan or rural), high school type (public or private), parents' socioeconomic status (SES), and motivations to study medicine. In total, 513 MS participated, 493 (96%) returned valid questionnaires, and 397 were enrolled in the study, (MMI group: 205 MS; JCEWT group: 192 MS). Irrespective of channel of admission, most MS came from metropolitan areas (80%-86%), belonged to high-SES families (73%-76%), and had mixed motivations (51%-96%). Female applicants, private school leavers, and those who were less motivated by the physician's SES were more likely to be selected through the MMI channel than the JCEWT channel. Irrespective of the channels of entry, MS had similar demographics and motivations for studying medicine. MS selected through MMI had different characteristics than those selected through a JCEWT.
ISSN:0142-159X
1466-187X
DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2021.1902965