Deriving the Complementarity Effect: Relativized minimality in Breton agreement
Breton φ-agreement is characterized by the Complementarity Effect, which allows pro-dropped but not lexical DPs to control φ-agreement. We contrast verbal and prepositional systems: a lexical DP co-occurs with the root form of a preposition, but with a 3rd.sg. ( frozen agreement) form of a verb. We...
Saved in:
Published in | Lingua Vol. 116; no. 11; pp. 1915 - 1945 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01.11.2006
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Breton φ-agreement is characterized by the
Complementarity Effect, which allows
pro-dropped but not lexical DPs to control φ-agreement. We contrast verbal and prepositional systems: a lexical DP co-occurs with the root form of a preposition, but with a 3rd.sg. (
frozen agreement) form of a verb. We argue that frozen agreement arises through φ-relativized locality: the Breton
vP independently shows nominal properties, and thus intervenes for agreement. The φ-probe of T Agrees with the
vP for 3rd.sg. rather than the
vP-internal subject. In the prepositional system on the other hand, lexical DPs occur with bare stems and φ-inflection spells out affixed pronouns. The mechanics predict that in verbal constructions where the subject originates outside the
vP, it is local enough to control the agreement of T, which correctly yields
Have under a prepositional analysis as the sole verb immune to the Complementarity Effect. Finally, we propose a typology of Complementarity Effects in agreement depending on the interaction of intervention (frozen agreement) and syntactic incorporation past the intervener. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0024-3841 1872-6135 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.03.012 |