Differences in moral judgment predict behavior in a Covid triage game scenario
Moral beliefs influence decisions across many contexts, but researchers typically test how these beliefs translate into moral judgments in hypothetical dilemmas. While this is important, in this study (N = 248), we sought to extend these findings by exploring whether moral judgment (specifically uti...
Saved in:
Published in | Personality and individual differences Vol. 195; p. 111671 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.09.2022
Elsevier Science Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Moral beliefs influence decisions across many contexts, but researchers typically test how these beliefs translate into moral judgments in hypothetical dilemmas. While this is important, in this study (N = 248), we sought to extend these findings by exploring whether moral judgment (specifically utilitarian or deontological processing) predicted behavior in a commons dilemma game against other players (programmed bots) across multiple rounds in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. Importantly, participants had to weigh short-term needs against long-term dangers of exhausting the community pool (i.e., a tragedy of the commons). As hypothesized, increased utilitarian processing predicted reduced resource extraction from the community pool. In addition to showing that differences in moral judgment predict behavior in a game situation that simulates a somewhat ecologically valid dilemma, these results also replicate previous research connecting morality to opinions about Covid-19 vaccine requirements.
•Predicting differences in perception and behavior related to Covid-19 is important.•Replicates prior research about moral inclinations and vaccine opinion•Commons dilemmas can simulate morally significant real-world problems.•Moral inclinations predicted behavior in a Covid related commons dilemma game.•Utilitarian processing predicted actions more likely to avoid collective tragedy. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0191-8869 1873-3549 0191-8869 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111671 |