Comparison of ANN, MVR, and SWR models for computing thermal efficiency of a solar still

• Published in: International journal of green energy Vol. 13; no. 10; pp. 1016 - 1025
• Main Authors: Mashaly, Ahmed F., Alazba, A. A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Taylor & Francis 01.01.2016
• Subjects: Artificial neural network; Learning theory; Mathematical models; multivariate regression; Neural networks; Parameters; Regression; Salt water; solar desalination; step-wise regression; Thermal efficiency; Water temperature
• ISSN: 1543-5075; 1543-5083
• DOI: 10.1080/15435075.2016.1206000

In this paper, the viability of modeling the instantaneous thermal efficiency (η ith ) of a solar still was determined using meteorological and operational data with an artificial neural network (ANN), multivariate regression (MVR), and stepwise regression (SWR). This study used meteorological and operational variables to hypothesize the effect of solar still performance. In the ANN model, nine variables were used as input parameters: Julian day, ambient temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, solar radiation, feed water temperature, brine water temperature, total dissolved solids of feed water, and total dissolved solids of brine water. The η ith was represented by one node in the output layer. The same parameters were used in the MVR and SWR models. The advantages and disadvantages were discussed to provide different points of view for the models. The performance evaluation criteria indicated that the ANN model was better than the MVR and SWR models. The mean coefficient of determination for the ANN model was about 13% and14% more accurate than those of the MVR and SWR models, respectively. In addition, the mean root mean square error values of 6.534% and 6.589% for the MVR and SWR models, respectively, were almost double that of the mean values for the ANN model. Although both MVR and SWR models provided similar results, those for the MVR were comparatively better. The relative errors of predicted η ith values for the ANN model were mostly in the vicinity of ±10%. Consequently, the use of the ANN model is preferred, due to its high precision in predicting η ith compared to the MVR and SWR models. This study should be extremely beneficial to those coping with the design of solar stills.