Fitness and life-history traits of the two major mitochondrial DNA haplotypes of Drosophila subobscura
Mitochondrial DNA restriction site analyses on natural populations of Drosophila subobscura have proved the existence of two common, coexisting haplotypes (I and II), as well as a set of less frequent ones derived from them. To explain this distribution, experiments to date point practically to all...
Saved in:
Published in | Heredity Vol. 93; no. 4; pp. 371 - 378 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Springer Nature B.V
01.10.2004
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Mitochondrial DNA restriction site analyses on natural populations of Drosophila subobscura have proved the existence of two common, coexisting haplotypes (I and II), as well as a set of less frequent ones derived from them. To explain this distribution, experiments to date point practically to all possible genetic mechanisms being involved in the changes of gene frequencies (cytonuclear coadaptation, direct natural selection on mtDNA and genetic drift). In an attempt to find differences that help to understand the dynamics of these haplotypes and to detect the effect of selection, we measured certain fitness components and life-history traits (egg-larva and larva-adult viabilities and developmental times, longevity, resistance to desiccation and optimal density) of the two main haplotypes I and II when maintained in laboratory population cages. As a general trend, haplotype II showed a higher net fitness than haplotype I, which explains the superiority of haplotype II over haplotype I in experimental populations but not their coexistence in nature, where additional factors must be considered. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0018-067X 1365-2540 |
DOI: | 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800513 |