Three-Dimensional Changes of Condylar Position After Bimaxillary Surgery to Correct Skeletal III Malocclusion: Cone Beam Computed Tomography Voxel-Based Superimposition Analysis

The stability of the condylar position within the first 3 months after orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion is crucial for subsequent orthodontic treatment. The purpose was to compare condylar positional changes 3 months after bimaxillary surgery to correct skeletal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of oral and maxillofacial surgery Vol. 82; no. 10; pp. 1224 - 1238
Main Authors Panpitakkul, Panjaree, Jorns, Teekayu Plangkoon, Kongsomboon, Supaporn, Chaichit, Rajda, Sutthiprapaporn, Pipop
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.10.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The stability of the condylar position within the first 3 months after orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion is crucial for subsequent orthodontic treatment. The purpose was to compare condylar positional changes 3 months after bimaxillary surgery to correct skeletal Class III deformities, utilizing the conventional two-dimensional combined with cone beam computed tomography voxel-based superimposition analysis. This retrospective cohort study included skeletal Class III patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery at Khon Kaen University, Thailand, in 2020. Exclusion criteria were patients with temporomandibular disorder symptoms, facial asymmetry prior to the surgery, or surgical complications. The exposure variable was the timing, both preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. This 3-month postoperative time point was chosen because complete healing of the bimaxillary surgery is expected by then, without any potential influence of condylar changes resulting from subsequent orthodontic treatment. The outcome variables are condylar position measurement, joint space (mm), and axial condylar angle (degrees). Demographics (age, sex) and surgical details (direction and amount of movement) were collected as covariates. Statistical analysis of condylar positional changes and correlations was performed using paired t-test and linear correlation (P value < .05), respectively. The sample included 11 subjects (22 condyles), with a mean age of 24 ± 5.24 years. Both two-dimensional measurements and voxel-based three-dimensional superimposition showed significant changes in condylar position 3 months after bimaxillary surgery: inferior (0.45 ± 0.26 mm, P < .001), posterior (0.46 ± 0.39 mm, P = .003), lateral (0.38 ± 0.42 mm, P = .01) displacement, and inward rotation (5.21 ± 2.54°, P < .001). No significant correlation was found between jaw movement distance and condylar changes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report measures of condylar changes at 3 months, when complete healing of the osteotomies would be expected, using Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement combined with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback. These changes are small in magnitude and may be of little relevance to patient care.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0278-2391
1531-5053
1531-5053
DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2024.05.014