Wind Farm Wakes Simulated Using WRF

Optimization of wind turbine (WT) arrays to maximize system-wide power production (i.e. minimize 'wind-theft') requires high-fidelity simulations of array-array interactions at the regional scale. This study systematically compares two parameterizations (Fitch and EWP) developed to describ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of physics. Conference series Vol. 1256; no. 1; pp. 12025 - 12034
Main Authors Pryor, S C, Shepherd, T J, Barthelmie, R J, Hahmann, A N, Volker, P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bristol IOP Publishing 01.07.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Optimization of wind turbine (WT) arrays to maximize system-wide power production (i.e. minimize 'wind-theft') requires high-fidelity simulations of array-array interactions at the regional scale. This study systematically compares two parameterizations (Fitch and EWP) developed to describe wind farm impacts on atmospheric flow in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. We present new year-long simulations for a nested domain centred on Iowa (the state with highest WT density) in the US Midwest that employ real WT characteristics and locations. Simulations with Fitch and EWP indicate similar seasonality in system-wide gross capacity factors (CF) for WT operating in Iowa, but the gross CF are systematically higher in simulations using EWP. The mean gross CF from the Fitch scheme is 44.1%, while that from EWP is 46.4%. These differences in CF are due to marked differences in the intensity and vertical profile of wakes simulated by the two approaches. Output from EWP also indicates much smaller near-surface climate impacts from WT. For example, when summertime hourly near-surface temperature (T2m) from the 299 WT grid cells are compared (i.e. EWP or Fitch minus noWT) the results show warming of nocturnal temperatures (lowest decile of T2m) but the maximum warming is considerably larger in simulations with the Fitch scheme.
ISSN:1742-6588
1742-6596
DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1256/1/012025