Operations for extrahepatic bile duct cancers: are the results really improving?

Objective: To find out if our results for the treatment of extrahepatic bile duct cancer have improved we reviewed our latest patients as a comparison to a previously reported series from this department. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Tertiary referral centre, Sweden. Subjects: 102 patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe European journal of surgery Vol. 166; no. 7; pp. 535 - 539
Main Authors Lindell, Gert, Hansson, Lars, Dawiskiba, Sigmund, Andersson, Roland, Axelson, Jan, Ihse, Ingemar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published UK Taylor & Francis, Ltd 01.07.2000
Taylor & Francis
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: To find out if our results for the treatment of extrahepatic bile duct cancer have improved we reviewed our latest patients as a comparison to a previously reported series from this department. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Tertiary referral centre, Sweden. Subjects: 102 patients who presented with extrahepatic bile duct cancer 1979–1995. Main outcome measures: Morbidy, mortality, and short and long term survival. Results: 16 patients had various types of resection, which were radical in 14 according to the surgeon and in 10 according to the pathologist. One patient (6%) died in hospital, and 11 (44%) developed complications. 13 patients had other operations that did not involve resection, 23 had laparotomy alone, 61 had biliary drainage either by percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) or endoscopy, and 10 had no active treatment. One patient of the 16 (6%) who had resections has survived for more than five years and another one is still alive after 40 months. Conclusion: Long term survival has not improved for patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer in our hospital during the last decades. Copyright © 2000 Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Bibliography:istex:801D38694612D2AC1E4DC0E963B5610668EB9CBE
ArticleID:EJS434
ark:/67375/WNG-W65KM4MM-0
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1102-4151
1741-9271
DOI:10.1080/110241500750008592