Open management of the abdomen and planned reoperations in severe bacterial peritonitis

Objective: To assess the results of open management of the abdomen and planned re‐operations in severe bacterial peritonitis after perforation or anastomotic disruption of the digestive tract. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: University Hospital, The Netherlands. Subjects: 67 consecutive patien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe European journal of surgery Vol. 166; no. 1; pp. 44 - 49
Main Authors Bosscha, K., Hulstaert, P. F., Visser, M. R., van Vroonhoven, Th. J. M. V., van der Werken, Chr
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published UK Taylor & Francis, Ltd 01.01.2000
Taylor & Francis
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: To assess the results of open management of the abdomen and planned re‐operations in severe bacterial peritonitis after perforation or anastomotic disruption of the digestive tract. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: University Hospital, The Netherlands. Subjects: 67 consecutive patients. Interventions: Open management of the abdomen and planned reoperations. Main outcome measures: Hospital morbidity and mortality, long‐term follow‐up. Results: 38 patients developed multiple organ failure (MOF), but 29 needed only ventilatory and inotropic support. The mean number of re‐operations was nine. 16 patients developed severe bleeding and 16 fistulas. In‐hospital mortality was 42% (n = 28). Long‐term morbidity, particularly the number of abdominal wall defects (n = 10), was considerable. Conclusion: Despite open management of the abdomen and planned re‐operations, mortality of severe bacterial peritonitis still continues to be too high, and both short and long‐term morbidity are appreciable. The value of open management of the abdomen and planned re‐operations rests only on the clinical observation that other conventional surgical treatments of severe bacterial peritonitis often fail. Copyright © 2000 Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Bibliography:ArticleID:EJS544
istex:F9C42E917350A6C202956606FFAA59C1631DE666
ark:/67375/WNG-8Z1R6R5P-6
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1102-4151
1741-9271
DOI:10.1080/110241500750009690