The accuracy of downward short- and long-wave radiation at the earth's surface calculated using simple models
Estimates of the downward global solar and long-wave radiations are commonly made using simple models. We have tested the estimates produced by a number of these simple models against the values predicted by the radiative transfer model used in a climate model in order to determine their suitability...
Saved in:
Published in | Meteorological applications Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 33 - 39 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Cambridge, UK
Cambridge University Press
01.03.2004
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Estimates of the downward global solar and long-wave radiations are commonly made using simple models. We have tested the estimates produced by a number of these simple models against the values predicted by the radiative transfer model used in a climate model in order to determine their suitability for global applications. For clear sky, two simple models were comparable, but under cloudy conditions a combination of a clear-sky model based on the Angstrom-Prescott equation (which deals with the downwelling solar radiation) with a cloud transmissivity utilising total cloud fraction proved best. The lowest root mean square errors were 27 W m−2 for clear-sky global solar radiation and 90 W m−2 for cloudy conditions. For downward long-wave radiation in clear-sky conditions, the model of Garratt (1992) performed best with a root mean square error of 24 W m−2. However, in cloudy conditions the model of Idso & Jackson (1969) performed best with a root mean square error of 22 W m−2, and, as it performs nearly as well as that of Garratt (1992) in clear-sky conditions, it is probably the best choice. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1350-4827 1469-8080 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S1350482703001154 |