Making the subjects of mental health care: a cross‐cultural comparison of mental health policy in Hong Kong, China and New South Wales, Australia

Constituting ‘social problems’ in particular ways has a range of effects, including for how subjects are positioned within policy and discourse. Employing an approach grounded in poststructuralist and social constructionist thinking, this analysis interrogates how the subjects of mental health care...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSociology of health & illness Vol. 41; no. 4; pp. 740 - 754
Main Authors Cui, Jialiang, Lancaster, Kari, Newman, Christy E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0141-9889
1467-9566
1467-9566
DOI10.1111/1467-9566.12851

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Constituting ‘social problems’ in particular ways has a range of effects, including for how subjects are positioned within policy and discourse. Employing an approach grounded in poststructuralist and social constructionist thinking, this analysis interrogates how the subjects of mental health care were constituted and problematised in mental health policies in two distinctive contexts, unsettling the taken‐for granted assumptions which underpin these problematisations. Two policies were selected for analysis as exemplar pieces of mental health policy reform in Hong Kong and New South Wales (NSW). Subjects were constituted as ‘patientised’ individuals (in Hong Kong) encouraged to depend on professionals who help them reintegrate into the ‘normal’ community, and as ‘traumatised’ individuals (in NSW) expected to take responsibility to guide the delivery of mental health care and respected as a part of diversity in community settings. While both policies constituted subjects as ‘unwell individuals’ and enacted ‘dividing practices’, subjectivities were shaped by distinctive cultural and socio‐political contexts. This analysis shifts our attention away from a focus on the effectiveness of policy solutions to the heterogeneity and contingency of policy ‘problems’ and ‘subjects’, opening up new possibilities for ‘out‐of‐the‐box’ policy responses to mental health.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0141-9889
1467-9566
1467-9566
DOI:10.1111/1467-9566.12851