Moving toward precision PTSD treatment: predicting veterans' intensive PTSD treatment response using continuously updating machine learning models

• Published in: Psychological medicine Vol. 53; no. 12; pp. 5500 - 5509
• Main Authors: Smith, Dale L., Held, Philip
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.09.2023
• Subjects: Accuracy; Bayesian analysis; Cognition; Cognitive ability; Ethnicity; Information processing; Learning algorithms; Machine learning; Mathematical models; Original; Original Article; Post traumatic stress disorder; Precision medicine; Prediction models; Severity; Timing; Treatment programs; Trees; Veterans; PTSD; longitudinal analysis; precision medicine; veterans; Cognitive processing therapy; machine learning
• ISSN: 0033-2917; 1469-8978
• DOI: 10.1017/S0033291722002689

Abstract Background Considerable heterogeneity exists in treatment response to first-line posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatments, such as Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT). Relatively little is known about the timing of when during a course of care the treatment response becomes apparent. Novel machine learning methods, especially continuously updating prediction models, have the potential to address these gaps in our understanding of response and optimize PTSD treatment. Methods Using data from a 3-week ( n = 362) CPT-based intensive PTSD treatment program (ITP), we explored three methods for generating continuously updating prediction models to predict endpoint PTSD severity. These included Mixed Effects Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (MixedBART), Mixed Effects Random Forest (MERF) machine learning models, and Linear Mixed Effects models (LMM). Models used baseline and self-reported PTSD symptom severity data collected every other day during treatment. We then validated our findings by examining model performances in a separate, equally established, 2-week CPT-based ITP ( n = 108). Results Results across approaches were very similar and indicated modest prediction accuracy at baseline ( R 2 ~ 0.18), with increasing accuracy of predictions of final PTSD severity across program timepoints (e.g. mid-program R 2 ~ 0.62). Similar findings were obtained when the models were applied to the 2-week ITP. Neither the MERF nor the MixedBART machine learning approach outperformed LMM prediction, though benefits of each may differ based on the application. Conclusions Utilizing continuously updating models in PTSD treatments may be beneficial for clinicians in determining whether an individual is responding, and when this determination can be made.