Current Paradigms of Combination Therapy in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Bacteremia: Does it Work, Which Combination, and For Which Patients?

Abstract The last several years have seen an emergence of literature documenting the utility of combination antimicrobial therapy, particularly in the salvage of refractory methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. Recent clinical data are shaping conundrums of which regimens ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical infectious diseases Vol. 73; no. 12; pp. 2353 - 2360
Main Authors Rose, Warren, Fantl, Michael, Geriak, Matthew, Nizet, Victor, Sakoulas, George
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published US Oxford University Press 16.12.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract The last several years have seen an emergence of literature documenting the utility of combination antimicrobial therapy, particularly in the salvage of refractory methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. Recent clinical data are shaping conundrums of which regimens may be more beneficial, which can be potentially harmful, and which subset of patients stand to benefit from more aggressive treatment regimens than called for by current standards. In addition, the incorporation of combination therapy for MRSA bacteremia should be accompanied by the reminder that antimicrobial therapy does not need to be uniform for the entire duration, with an early intensive phase in high inoculum infections (eg, with combination therapy), followed by a consolidation phase (ie, monotherapy). This review and perspective consolidates the recent data on this subject and directs future goals in filling the knowledge gaps to methodically move forward towards improving patient outcomes. This review consolidates the recent data on combination therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, provides perspective on potential use and applicable patients, and directs future goals in filling the knowledge gaps to methodically move forward toward improving patient outcomes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1058-4838
1537-6591
1537-6591
DOI:10.1093/cid/ciab452