Overcoming the dichotomy of implementing societal flood risk management while conserving instream fish habitat – A long-term study from a highly modified urban river

• Published in: Journal of environmental management Vol. 224; pp. 69 - 76
• Main Authors: Angelopoulos, N.V., Harvey, J.P., Bolland, J.D., Nunn, A.D., Noble, R.A.A., Smith, M.A., Taylor, M.J., Masters, J.E.G., Moxon, J., Cowx, I.G.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 15.10.2018
• Subjects: Climate change; European directives; Fisheries; Policy; River rehabilitation; Urban river; Policy; European directives; Climate change; Fisheries; River rehabilitation; Urban river
• ISSN: 0301-4797; 1095-8630
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.030

Flood Risk Management (FRM) is often essential to reduce the risk of flooding to properties and infrastructure in urban landscapes, but typically degrades the habitats required by many aquatic animals for foraging, refuge and reproduction. This conflict between flood risk management and biodiversity is driven by conflicting directives, such as the EU Floods and Water Framework Directives, and has led to a requirement for synergistic solutions for FRM that integrate river restoration actions. Unfortunately, ecological monitoring and appraisal of combined FRM and river restoration works is inadequate. This paper uses a case study from the River Don in Northern England to evaluate the effects of the FRM and subsequent river restoration works on instream habitat and the associated fish assemblage over an 8-year period. Flood risk management created a homogeneous channel but did not negatively affect fish species composition or densities, specifically brown trout. Densities of adult brown trout were comparable pre and post-FRM, while densities of juvenile bullhead and brown trout increased dramatically post FRM. River restoration works created a heterogeneous channel but did not significantly improve species composition or brown trout density. Species composition post-river restoration works returned to that similar to pre-FRM over a short-term period, but with improved numbers of juvenile bullhead. Although habitat complexity increased after river restoration works, long-term changes in species composition and densities were marginal, probably because the river reset habitat complexity within the time framework of the study. •Flood risk management created a wide and shallow homogenous channel•Flood risk management had no negative impact on fish species composition•Restoration created a heterogeneous channel increasing flow and substrate diversity•Post restoration species composition did not return to the baseline pre-flood works•Flood risk management planning should integrate river restoration