Power Management of Datacenter Workloads Using Per-Core Power Gating

While modern processors offer a wide spectrum of software-controlled power modes, most datacenters only rely on Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling (DVFS, a.k.a. P-states) to achieve energy efficiency. This paper argues that, in the case of datacenter workloads, DVFS is not the only option for pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE computer architecture letters Vol. 8; no. 2; pp. 48 - 51
Main Authors Leverich, Jacob, Monchiero, Matteo, Talwar, Vanish, Ranganathan, Parthasarathy, Kozyrakis, Christos
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.07.2009
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:While modern processors offer a wide spectrum of software-controlled power modes, most datacenters only rely on Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling (DVFS, a.k.a. P-states) to achieve energy efficiency. This paper argues that, in the case of datacenter workloads, DVFS is not the only option for processor power management. We make the case for per-core power gating (PCPG) as an additional power management knob for multi-core processors. PCPG is the ability to cut the voltage supply to selected cores, thus reducing to almost zero the leakage power for the gated cores. Using a testbed based on a commercial 4-core chip and a set of real-world application traces from enterprise environments, we have evaluated the potential of PCPG. We show that PCPG can significantly reduce a processor's energy consumption (up to 40%) without significant performance overheads. When compared to DVFS, PCPG is highly effective saving up to 30% more energy than DVFS. When DVFS and PCPG operate together they can save up to almost 60%.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1556-6056
1556-6064
DOI:10.1109/L-CA.2009.46