Cutaneous thermosensory mapping of the female breast and pelvis

• Published in: Physiology & behavior Vol. 262; p. 114112
• Main Authors: Valenza, Alessandro, Merrick, Charlotte, Blount, Hannah, Ward, Jade, Bianco, Antonino, Worsley, Peter R., Filingeri, Davide
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.04.2023
• Subjects: Breast; Cold Temperature; Female; Hot Temperature; Humans; Pelvis; Skin; Skin Temperature; Thermoreceptors; Thermosensing; Thermoreceptors; ANOVA; Breast; Female; VAS; Skin; Pelvis; Tsk
• ISSN: 0031-9384; 1873-507X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2023.114112

•Female breast and pelvis present a heterogenous distribution of warm, but not cold, thermal sensitivity.•Variations in baseline local skin temperature across the breast and pelvis were not associated with variations in warm thermal sensitivity.•Mechanisms intrinsic to the thermosensory function of the skin may underlie the observed heterogenous thermal sensitivity distribution. Differences in skin thermal sensitivity have been extensively mapped across areas of the human body, including the torso, limbs, and extremities. Yet, there are parts of the female body, such as the breast and the pelvis for which we have limited thermal sensitivity data. The aim of this study was to map cutaneous warm and cold sensitivity across skin areas of the breast and pelvis that are commonly covered by female underwear. Twelve young females (21.9 ± 3.2 years) reported on a 200 mm visual analogue scale the perceived magnitude of local thermal sensations arising from short-duration (10 s) static application of a cold [5 °C below local skin temperature (Tsk)] or warm (5 °C above local Tsk) thermal probe (25 cm2) in seventeen locations over the breast and pelvis regions. The data revealed that thermal sensitivity to the warm probe, but not the cold probe, varied by up to 25% across the breast [mean difference between lowest and highest sensitivity location was 51 mm (95% CI:14, 89; p < 0.001)] and up to 23% across the pelvis [mean difference between lowest and highest sensitivity location: 46 mm (95% CI:9, 84; p = 0.001)]. The regional differences in baseline Tsk did not account for variance in warm thermal sensitivity. Inter-individual variability in thermal sensitivity ranged between 24 and 101% depending on skin location. We conclude that the skin across the female breast and pelvis presents a heterogenous distribution of warm, but not cold, thermal sensitivity. These findings may inform the design of more comfortable clothing that are mapped to the thermal needs of the female body.