Does information of predators influence general wariness?

• Published in: Behavioral ecology and sociobiology Vol. 60; no. 5; pp. 742 - 747
• Main Authors: Adams, Jessica L, Camelio, Kari W, Orique, Matthew J, Blumstein, Daniel T
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01.09.2006; Berlin Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: acoustics; Aerial locomotion; Animal ethology; Animal vocalization; antipredatory behavior; Aves; Aviculture; Behavior; Biological and medical sciences; Bird songs; Birds; Birds of prey; Eagles; Falcons; flight; Foraging; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Peregrinus; Platycercus elegans; Predators; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Reflectiveness; Vertebrata; Vertebrata; Crimson rosellas; Acquisition process; Defensive behavior; Predator recognition; Antipredator behavior; Predator; Aves; Flight initiation distance; Distance; Recognition
• ISSN: 0340-5443; 1432-0762
• DOI: 10.1007/s00265-006-0218-9

Antipredator behavior includes several qualitatively distinct activities, but few studies have determined the degree to which these activities are independent. If behaviors are not independent, then the nature of the relationship would illustrate potential performance constraints. We studied crimson rosellas (Platycercus elegans) and first focused on acoustic predator discrimination. We measured time allocation before and after playback of one of three experimental treatments (peregrine falcons—Falco peregrinus, wedge-tailed eagles—Aquila audax, and crimson rosellas) to determine whether or not rosellas discriminated predators from non-predators, and specifically whether or not they discriminated large from small predators. We then focused on the decision to flee. We experimentally approached subjects and measured the distance at which they oriented to us (alert distance) and the distance at which they fled (flight initiation distance; FID). We found that rosellas could distinguish among predators; however, there was no effect on general wariness as measured by FID. These two processes of antipredator behavior may, thus, be independent.