Integrative propositions for adapting conservation policy to the impacts of climate change

• Published in: Global environmental change Vol. 20; no. 2; pp. 351 - 362
• Main Authors: Hagerman, Shannon, Dowlatabadi, Hadi, Chan, Kai M.A., Satterfield, Terre
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2010
• Subjects: Biodiversity; Biodiversity conservation; Climate change; Conservation; Conservation policy; Disturbances; Drivers; Ecology; Environmental policy; Heuristic; Mathematical analysis; Nature conservation; Objectives and means; Policies; Policy analysis; Policy change; Policy making; Protected values; Resource management; Social–ecological systems; Strategy; Protected values; Climate change; Biodiversity conservation; Policy change; Conservation policy; Objectives and means; Social–ecological systems
• ISSN: 0959-3780; 1872-9495
• DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.002

Conservation policies have changed over time in response to changes in human and ecological drivers. The impacts of climate (and other) concurrent changes prompt consideration of further iterations for both conservation means and objectives. In this paper we bring together previous disparate literatures and apply them to the question of how to adapt conservation polices to suit an era of climate change impacts. Our approach is based on two assertions: (i) that the integration of specific natural and social science insights is essential for understanding and effectively responding to this challenge, and (ii) that in addition to adaptive conservation means (strategies), attention needs to be given to considering adaptive conservation objectives. Specifically, we convert a core set of natural and social science insights into analytical tools known as heuristics or rules of thumb. We then use the heuristics as a basis to offer a list of preliminary propositions that can help inform the development of new means and objectives. The propositions address key considerations including recalibrating management objectives, the role of disturbance in facilitating ecological transitions, and overarching topics relating to governance. The propositions are speculative, and so intended only to outline potential avenues for further empirical research and subsequent refinement. In the spirit of adaptation, we expect and welcome their revision.