Making conservation physiology relevant to policy makers and conservation practitioners
The recognition that physiological tools and knowledge have the potential to inform conservation policy has led to the definition of the nascent discipline of “conservation physiology.” Indeed, conservation physiology has much to offer policy makers because of the rigorous experimental approach and...
Saved in:
Published in | Conservation letters Vol. 3; no. 3; pp. 159 - 166 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Malden, USA
Blackwell Publishing Inc
01.06.2010
John Wiley & Sons, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The recognition that physiological tools and knowledge have the potential to inform conservation policy has led to the definition of the nascent discipline of “conservation physiology.” Indeed, conservation physiology has much to offer policy makers because of the rigorous experimental approach and the focus on elucidating cause‐and‐effect relationships. However, there remain a number of challenges that might retard the adoption of this approach. Here, we identify these challenges and suggest a path for both physiologists and conservation practitioners to integrate their respective fields. One issue is that threat assessments and conservation actions tend to focus on populations or species, whereas physiology tends to focus on individuals, cells, or molecules. Physiologists must determine if and how the physiology of individual organisms can influence population‐level processes. It is also necessary to validate more tools in the “conservation physiology toolbox,” and ensure a thorough understanding of the physiological biomarkers applied to conservation efforts. Research on imperiled taxa will be more useful to those making management decisions, rather than research focused on model species. We also recommend changes in the education of physiologists such that physiologists understand the process of policy making, and the needs of conservation practitioners. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:CONL109 ark:/67375/WNG-BSC8139G-K istex:936C2E2662C3D9A348590386B06D84CD44E92DB1 Editor Prof. Corey Bradshaw ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1755-263X 1755-263X |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00109.x |