Clinical complications in renal biopsy using two different needle gauges: The impact of large hematomas, a random clinical trial study
Objective To compare complications of ultrasound‐guided percutaneous renal biopsy using two needle gauges (16‐G and 18‐G). Methods A total of 238 individuals with renal biopsy indication were included and randomly separated into two groups: ultrasound‐guided percutaneous renal biopsy procedure carri...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of urology Vol. 25; no. 6; pp. 544 - 548 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Australia
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.06.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective
To compare complications of ultrasound‐guided percutaneous renal biopsy using two needle gauges (16‐G and 18‐G).
Methods
A total of 238 individuals with renal biopsy indication were included and randomly separated into two groups: ultrasound‐guided percutaneous renal biopsy procedure carried out with a 16‐G or 18‐G needle. The adequacy of biopsy samples and post‐procedure complications were compared between the two groups.
Results
The procedures carried out with a 16‐G needle collected fragments with a mean of 22.1 ± 10.8 glomeruli, and those carried out with an 18‐G needle had a mean of 17.5 ± 9.4 glomeruli. Patients submitted to renal biopsies with a 16‐G needle had a higher likelihood of having a complication (OR5.1, 95% CI 1.7–15.4, P = 0.001). The overall mean volume of post‐biopsy hematoma in patients with complications was significantly larger than those without complications (44 ± 56.1 mL vs 5.9 ± 6.6 mL; P < 0.001).
Conclusions
Renal biopsies carried out by ultrasonography using an 18‐G needle provide adequate histological analysis, showing a lower amount of glomeruli but with similar clinical quality as a 16‐G needle. Furthermore, it is associated with a lower risk of procedure‐related complications. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0919-8172 1442-2042 |
DOI: | 10.1111/iju.13559 |