Proteomic fingerprinting facilitates biodiversity assessments in understudied ecosystems: A case study on integrated taxonomy of deep sea copepods

• Published in: Molecular ecology resources Vol. 21; no. 6; pp. 1936 - 1951
• Main Authors: Renz, Jasmin, Markhaseva, Elena L., Laakmann, Silke, Rossel, Sven, Martinez Arbizu, Pedro, Peters, Janna
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.08.2021
• Subjects: Abyssal zone; Biodiversity; calanoid copepods; Cluster analysis; COI sequencing; Copepoda; Deep sea; deep sea biodiversity; Deep sea environments; Fingerprinting; Learning algorithms; Machine learning; MALDI‐TOF MS; Morphology; New species; Peptide mapping; Physical characteristics; proteomic fingerprinting; Species diversity; Species richness; Taxonomy; Zooplankton; MALDI-TOF MS; calanoid copepods; deep sea biodiversity; COI sequencing; proteomic fingerprinting
• ISSN: 1755-098X; 1755-0998
• DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13405

Accurate and reliable biodiversity estimates of marine zooplankton are a prerequisite to understand how changes in diversity can affect whole ecosystems. Species identification in the deep sea is significantly impeded by high numbers of new species and decreasing numbers of taxonomic experts, hampering any assessment of biodiversity. We used in parallel morphological, genetic, and proteomic characteristics of specimens of calanoid copepods from the abyssal South Atlantic to test if proteomic fingerprinting can accelerate estimating biodiversity. We cross‐validated the respective molecular discrimination methods with morphological identifications to establish COI and proteomic reference libraries, as they are a pre‐requisite to assign taxonomic information to the identified molecular species clusters. Due to the high number of new species only 37% of the individuals could be assigned to species or genus level morphologically. COI sequencing was successful for 70% of the specimens analysed, while proteomic fingerprinting was successful for all specimens examined. Predicted species richness based on morphological and molecular methods was 42 morphospecies, 56 molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) and 79 proteomic operational taxonomic units (POTUs), respectively. Species diversity was predicted based on proteomic profiles using hierarchical cluster analysis followed by application of the variance ratio criterion for identification of species clusters. It was comparable to species diversity calculated based on COI sequence distances. Less than 7% of specimens were misidentified by proteomic profiles when compared with COI derived MOTUs, indicating that unsupervised machine learning using solely proteomic data could be used for quickly assessing species diversity.