A population based study on the intra and inter-rater reliability of the clock drawing test in Brazil: the Bambuí Health and Ageing Study
Background Reliability should be considered when selecting a scoring system since it influences validity. CDT reliability has rarely been assessed in population based studies and in developing countries. The aim of the present study was to determine intra and inter–rater reliabilities of the CDT sco...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of geriatric psychiatry Vol. 18; no. 5; pp. 450 - 456 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
01.05.2003
Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Reliability should be considered when selecting a scoring system since it influences validity. CDT reliability has rarely been assessed in population based studies and in developing countries. The aim of the present study was to determine intra and inter–rater reliabilities of the CDT scored by the Shulman (2000) method, in elderly with very low formal educational level from Brazil.
Methods
CDTs performed by a random sample of 202 subjects of a population‐based cohort of elderly were scored on two occasions by the same rater and by two independent raters. Reliability was measured using the kappa statistic, weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Data were stratified according to gender, age and schooling level.
Results
Intra and inter–rater reliabilities were excellent when CDTs were classified as ‘normal’ (scores 4 or 5) or ‘abnormal’ (scores 0 to 3) (kappa = 0.99 and 0.94, respectively) and were in the good to excellent range when scored from 0 to 5 (kappa = 0.88 and 0.74, respectively). Difficulties in distinguishing between scores 4 and 5, and a low proportion of score 1 tests were found.
Conclusions
The CDT scored by the Shulman (2000) method appears to have good to excellent reliability in an elderly population with very low formal educational level. However, difficulties in distinguishing between scores 4 and 5, and a low proportion of score 1 tests suggest these scores may not be totally adequate for this population. Further studies are necessary to determine the consistency of our results in similar populations. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil) - No. 520337/96-4; No. 301056/94-3; No. 300908/95-4 ArticleID:GPS863 Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP, Brazil) - No. 66940009-00 istex:B250EDC5A640A0FBF469838C09A9B00D8847D701 ark:/67375/WNG-K52HHZXP-8 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0885-6230 1099-1166 |
DOI: | 10.1002/gps.863 |