Pharmacokinetics of a novel, approved, 1.4‐mg intranasal naloxone formulation for reversal of opioid overdose—a randomized controlled trial

• Published in: Addiction (Abingdon, England) Vol. 114; no. 5; pp. 859 - 867
• Main Authors: Skulberg, Arne Kristian, Åsberg, Anders, Khiabani, Hasse Zare, Røstad, Hilde, Tylleskar, Ida, Dale, Ola
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2019
• Subjects: Administration; antidotes; Bioavailability; Clinical research; Clinical trials; Computer simulation; Concentration; Dosage; Drug addiction; Drug overdose; Evidence-based medicine; intramuscular adminisration; intramuscular drug overdose; intranasal administration; Intravenous administration; Linearity; Liquid chromatography; Mass spectrometry; Mass spectroscopy; Measurement; Naloxone; narcotic antagonists; Narcotics; Nasal sprays; Opioids; Overdose; Pharmacokinetics; Randomization; Reversal; Spectrometry; substance‐related disorders; Titration; Volunteers; Women; Administration; antidotes; narcotic antagonists; intramuscular adminisration; intranasal administration; substance-related disorders; intravenous administration; naloxone; drug overdose; intramuscular drug overdose
• ISSN: 0965-2140; 1360-0443
• DOI: 10.1111/add.14552

Background and aims Intranasal (i.n.) naloxone is an established treatment for opioid overdose. Anyone likely to witness an overdose should have access to the antidote. We aimed to determine whether an i.n. formulation delivering 1.4 mg naloxone hydrochloride would achieve systemic exposure comparable to that of 0.8 mg intramuscular (i.m.) naloxone. Design Open, randomized four‐way cross‐over trial. Setting Clinical Trials Units in St Olav's Hospital, Trondheim and Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway. Participants Twenty‐two healthy human volunteers, 10 women, median age = 25.8 years. Intervention and comparator One and two doses of i.n. 1.4 mg naloxone compared with i.m. 0.8 mg and intravenous (i.v.) 0.4 mg naloxone. Measurements Quantification of plasma naloxone was performed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic non‐compartment analyses were used for the main analyses. A non‐parametric pharmacokinetic population model was developed for Monte Carlo simulations of different dosing scenarios. Findings Area under the curve from administration to last measured concentration (AUC0‐last) for i.n. 1.4 mg and i.m. 0.8 mg were 2.62 ± 0.94 and 3.09 ± 0.64 h × ng/ml, respectively (P = 0.33). Maximum concentration (Cmax) was 2.36 ± 0.68 ng/ml for i.n. 1.4 mg and 3.73 ± 3.34 for i.m. 0.8 mg (P = 0.72). Two i.n. doses showed dose linearity and achieved a Cmax of 4.18 ± 1.53 ng/ml. Tmax was reached after 20.2 ± 9.4 minutes for i.n. 1.4 mg and 13.6 ± 15.4 minutes for i.m. 0.8 mg (P = 0.098). The absolute bioavailability for i.n. 1.4 mg was 0.49 (±0.24), while the relative i.n./i.m. bioavailability was 0.52 (±0.25). Conclusion Intranasal 1.4 mg naloxone provides adequate systemic concentrations to treat opioid overdose compared with intramuscular 0.8 mg, without statistical difference on maximum plasma concentration, time to maximum plasma concentration or area under the curve. Simulations support its appropriateness both as peer administered antidote and for titration of treatment by professionals.