Cardiac Rehabilitation in Older Adults

• Published in: Canadian journal of cardiology Vol. 32; no. 9; pp. 1088 - 1096
• Main Authors: Schopfer, David W., MD, MAS, Forman, Daniel E., MD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Inc 01.09.2016
• Subjects: Aged; Cardiac Rehabilitation; Cardiovascular; Cardiovascular Diseases - therapy; Cognitive Dysfunction - prevention & control; Depression - therapy; Exercise Tolerance; Humans; Life Style; Mortality; Patient Compliance; Patient Education as Topic; Quality of Life; Referral and Consultation; Social Participation
• ISSN: 0828-282X; 1916-7075
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.03.003

Abstract The biology of aging and the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease (CVD) overlap, with the effect that CVD is endemic in the growing population of older adults. Moreover, CVD in older adults is usually complicated by age-related complexities, including multimorbidity, polypharmacy, frailty, and other intricacies that add to the risks of ambiguous symptoms, deconditioning, iatrogenesis, falls, disability, and other challenges. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a comprehensive lifestyle program that can have particular benefit for older patients with cardiovascular conditions. Although CR was originally designed primarily as an exercise training program for younger adults after a myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass surgery, it has evolved as a comprehensive lifestyle program (promoting physical activity as well as education, diet, risk reduction, and adherence) for a broader range of CVD (coronary heart disease, heart failure, and valvular heart disease). It provides a valuable opportunity to address and moderate many of the challenges pertinent for the large and growing population of older adults with CVD. Cardiac rehabilitation promotes physical function (cardiorespiratory fitness as well as strength and balance) that helps overcome disease and deconditioning as well as related vulnerabilities such as disability, frailty, and falls. Similarly, CR facilitates education, monitoring, and guidance to reduce iatrogenesis and promote adherence. Furthermore, CR fosters cognition, socialization, and independence in older patients. Yet despite all its conceptual benefits, CR is significantly underused in older populations. This review discusses benefits and the paradoxical underuse of CR, as well as evolving models of care that may achieve greater application and efficacy.