Intermittent catheterization with single- or multiple-reuse catheters: clinical study on safety and impact on quality of life

Purpose Intermittent catheterization (IC) is a proven effective long-term bladder management strategy for individuals who have lower urinary tract dysfunction. This study provides clinical evidence about multiple-reuse versus single-use catheterization techniques and if catheter choice can have an i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational urology and nephrology Vol. 52; no. 8; pp. 1443 - 1451
Main Authors Newman, Diane K., New, Peter W., Heriseanu, Roxana, Petronis, Sarunas, Håkansson, Joakim, Håkansson, Maria Å., Lee, Bonsan Bonne
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.08.2020
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose Intermittent catheterization (IC) is a proven effective long-term bladder management strategy for individuals who have lower urinary tract dysfunction. This study provides clinical evidence about multiple-reuse versus single-use catheterization techniques and if catheter choice can have an impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Method A prospective, multi-center, clinical trial studied patients who currently practiced catheter reuse, and who agreed to prospectively evaluate single-use hydrophilic-coated (HC) (i.e. LoFric) catheters for 4 weeks. A validated Intermittent Self-Catheterization Questionnaire (ISC-Q) was used to obtain HRQoL. Reused catheters were collected and studied with regard to microbial and debris contamination. Results The study included 39 patients who had practiced IC for a mean of 10 years, 6 times daily. At inclusion, all patients reused catheters for a mean of 21 days (SD = 48) per catheter. 36 patients completed the prospective test period and the mean ISC-Q score increased from 58.0 (SD = 22.6) to 67.2 (SD = 17.7) when patients switched to the single-use HC catheters ( p  = 0.0101). At the end of the study, 83% (95% CI [67–94%]) preferred to continue using single-use HC catheters. All collected reused catheters (100%) were contaminated by debris and 74% (95% CI [58–87%]) were contaminated by microorganisms, some with biofilm. Conclusion Single-use HC catheters improved HRQoL and were preferred over catheter reuse among people practicing IC. Catheter multiple-reuse may pose a potential safety concern due to colonization by microorganisms as well as having reduced acceptance compared to single use. Trial registry number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02129738.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0301-1623
1573-2584
1573-2584
DOI:10.1007/s11255-020-02435-9