Patient-Proxy Agreement on the Health-Related Quality of Life One Year after Traumatic Brain Injury

Abstract Objective To examine the level of agreement between patients and their proxies on a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQL) 1 year after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design A cross-sectional study. Participants and Setting: Eighty-eighty patients with TBI identified from discharge...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Vol. 98; no. 12; pp. 2540 - 2547
Main Authors Hwang, Hei-Fen, PhD, Chen, Chih-Yi, MS, Lin, Mau-Roung, PhD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.12.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Objective To examine the level of agreement between patients and their proxies on a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQL) 1 year after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design A cross-sectional study. Participants and Setting: Eighty-eighty patients with TBI identified from discharge records of four hospitals in Taiwan and 88 family members or friends who could answer questions regarding the patient’s health and HRQL 1 year after the injury. Main Outcome Measures A health profile of the brief Taiwanese version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) and two health utility measures of the time tradeoff (TTO) and standard gamble (SG). Results Compared to proxy responses, patients provided higher ratings of the WHOQOL-BREF’s domains and lower ratings of the TTO and SG. Intraclass correlation coefficients between patient and proxy ratings varied among the four WHOQOL-BREF’s domains, in which levels of agreement were moderate or good for physical capacity (0.69) and low for psychological well-being (0.45), social relationships (0.24), and the environment (0.32). Levels of agreement were extremely low for the TTO (0.0) and SG (0.10). A profile analysis showed that patients’ ratings on the WHOQOL-BREF, on average, were significantly greater than those of their proxies (with a mean difference of 3.07), with a similar distribution of scatter responses (with a mean difference of 0.002) and shape agreement (0.57). Greater variations in the patient-proxy level of agreement appeared in patients who were younger and had more-severe injuries, and also with parent and child proxies. Conclusions To assess the HRQL of patients with a TBI, the level of patient-proxy agreement was adequate for the physical domain but was lower for the social and environmental domains, and the agreement was very low for the TTO and SG. Furthermore, a patient’s age and injury severity, and patient-proxy’ relationship may affect the agreement.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-9993
1532-821X
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.05.013