“You need something like this to give you guidelines on what to do”: patients' and partners' use and perceptions of a self-directed coping skills training resource

• Published in: Supportive care in cancer Vol. 21; no. 12; pp. 3451 - 3460
• Main Authors: Lambert, Sylvie D., Girgis, Afaf, Turner, Jane, Regan, Tim, Candler, Hayley, Britton, Ben, Chambers, Suzanne, Lawsin, Catalina, Kayser, Karen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.12.2013; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adaptation, Psychological; Adjustment; Cancer; Cancer patients; Domestic partners; Female; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Intervention; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Neoplasms - psychology; Nursing; Nursing Research; Oncology; Original Article; Pain Medicine; Patient Education as Topic - methods; Patient Education as Topic - standards; Patient Satisfaction; Qualitative research; Rehabilitation Medicine; Caregivers; Partners; Qualitative study; Self-directed intervention; Oncology; Coping; Cancer
• ISSN: 0941-4355; 1433-7339
• DOI: 10.1007/s00520-013-1914-4

Purpose This study aims to report on the acceptability of a self-directed coping skills intervention, called Coping-Together , for patients affected by cancer and their partners, including the strengths and limitations of the intervention design. Methods This initial version of Coping-Together included a series of four booklets, which aimed to provide practical coping strategies for the day-to-day management of common physical and psychosocial challenges. Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 patients and/or 14 partners. Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed for content. Results Participants endorsed the self-directed format, and the focus of Coping-Together on practical information was a feature that set it apart from other resources. The majority of participants interviewed felt that the proposed coping strategies were “doable”; however, only half of the participants reported learning new coping skills after reading the booklets. Additional benefits of reading the booklets were increasing awareness of challenges to prepare for, giving hope that something can help you “pull through”, providing a sense of normality, connecting patients and partners to people and services, and complementing support received from health professionals. Despite the general acceptability of the intervention, some aspects of its design were criticized, including the workbook-like exercises, expectations about using the resource together, level of guidance provided, and amount of information included. In general, most participants felt that too much negative information was included, whereas more experiential information was desired. Conclusions Preliminary evaluation of Coping-Together supported its practical approach and highlighted improvements to enhance its contribution to patient and partner coping.