Comparison of the adjuvanticity of two adjuvant formulations containing de-O-acylated lipooligosaccharide on Japanese encephalitis vaccine in mice
Adjuvants are essential vaccine components used to enhance, accelerate, and/or prolong adaptive immunity against specific vaccine antigens. In this study, we compared the adjuvanticity of two adjuvant formulations containing de- O -acylated lipooligosaccharide (dLOS), a toll-like receptor 4 agonist,...
Saved in:
Published in | Archives of pharmacal research Vol. 41; no. 2; pp. 219 - 228 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Seoul
Pharmaceutical Society of Korea
01.02.2018
대한약학회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0253-6269 1976-3786 1976-3786 |
DOI | 10.1007/s12272-017-0985-z |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Adjuvants are essential vaccine components used to enhance, accelerate, and/or prolong adaptive immunity against specific vaccine antigens. In this study, we compared the adjuvanticity of two adjuvant formulations containing de-
O
-acylated lipooligosaccharide (dLOS), a toll-like receptor 4 agonist, on the Japanese encephalitis (JE) vaccine in mice. Mice were immunized once or twice at a two-week interval with inactivated JE vaccine in the absence or presence of adjuvant. We found that both the alum- and the liposome-based formulation induced significantly faster and higher serum IgG antibody responses as compared with the non-adjuvanted vaccine after either one or two immunizations. The antibody titers of the mouse immune sera correlated with 50% plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT
50
) antibody titers. In addition, the dLOS/liposome formulation was more effective in inducing a Th1-type immune response than the dLOS/alum formulation, as suggested by a strong antigen-specific interferon (IFN)-γ response. Based on these results, we suggest that both alum- and liposome-based adjuvant formulations containing dLOS may be used for the development of JE vaccines with improved immunogenicity. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0253-6269 1976-3786 1976-3786 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12272-017-0985-z |