Sex-based outcomes of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and impact of surgical technique

Because of differences in chest wall anatomy, female patients may have higher rates of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) pocket-related complications. We sought to evaluate sex-based outcomes after S-ICD implantation. Patients implanted with an S-ICD at Emory Healthcare bet...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeart rhythm Vol. 21; no. 10; pp. 1907 - 1911
Main Authors Vijayvargiya, Sonya, Mekary, Wissam, Jain, Vardhmaan, Rao, Birju R., Ibrahim, Rand, Patel, Anshul M., Shah, Anand D., DeLurgio, David B., Westerman, Stacy, Lloyd, Michael S., Bhatia, Neal, Merchant, Faisal M., El-Chami, Mikhael F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.10.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Because of differences in chest wall anatomy, female patients may have higher rates of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) pocket-related complications. We sought to evaluate sex-based outcomes after S-ICD implantation. Patients implanted with an S-ICD at Emory Healthcare between 2010 and 2023 were included in the analysis. Patients’ clinical characteristics and post–S-ICD implantation complications were collected. There were 429 male patients (68%) and 199 female patients (32%) observed for a median duration of 2.3 years (0.6–4.4 years). Male and female patients had comparable rates of diabetes (28%), end-stage renal disease (29.5%), ejection fraction (30.2% ± 13.4%), and body mass index (29.1 ± 6.6 kg/m2). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of shocks between men and women (26.3% vs 20.1%; P = .09), including appropriate shocks (14.7% vs 12%; P = .98) and inappropriate shocks (11.7% vs 9.5%; P = .98). Pocket-related complications occurred in 21 patients; these included pocket infection (n = 12), wound dehiscence (n = 7), and hematoma requiring drainage (n = 2). Female patients had a significantly higher pocket-related complication rate compared with male patients (7.2% vs 2.5%; P = .016). In controlling for age, body mass index, diabetes, and end-stage renal disease, female patients had higher odds of pocket-related complications compared with male patients (odds ratio, 3.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.27–7.75). Pocket-related complications decreased after 2018 compared with before 2018 (6% vs 2.6%, P = .052), mainly driven by reduction in complications in women (12.3% vs 3.2%; P = .034) but not in men (2.8% vs 2.4%; P = 1). In this cohort of S-ICD patients, women had a higher rate of post–S-ICD pocket-related complications that could be explained by sex-based differences in anatomy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1547-5271
1556-3871
1556-3871
DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.04.052