Biomechanical comparison of a multidirectional locking plate and conventional plates for the osteosynthesis of mandibular angle fractures—a preliminary study
Summary Introduction The objective of surgical fracture management is to reduce and fixate fractures accurately and rapidly. Two osteosynthesis plates are usually used in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures in order to enhance torsional stiffness. We conducted biomechanical tests under stati...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery Vol. 45; no. 12; pp. 1913 - 1920 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Scotland
Elsevier Ltd
01.12.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Summary Introduction The objective of surgical fracture management is to reduce and fixate fractures accurately and rapidly. Two osteosynthesis plates are usually used in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures in order to enhance torsional stiffness. We conducted biomechanical tests under static and cyclic loading in order to assess whether a single locking plate is as efficacious as two conventional plates in the osteosynthesis of mandibular angle fractures. Methods Fracture gaps were created in synthetic mandible replicas. After pretests, the stiffness of a single locking plate and different types of non-locking two-plate systems was assessed and compared under static and cyclic loading. The plates were subjected to a maximum static load of 750 N and underwent cyclic loading at a constant force of 400 N during a maximum of 500,000 cycles. Results No plastic deformation occurred in the static tests. Both types of osteosynthesis showed high static stability. The locking plate was significantly stiffer than the non-locking plates (p=0.0079). Cyclic loading tests did not reveal any significant differences. Conclusion Within the limitations of this preliminary study, a single locking miniplate appears to be as efficacious in biomechanical tests as non-locking two-plate systems for the management of mandibular angle fractures. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1010-5182 1878-4119 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.05.020 |