Feasibility of Pulse Oximetry Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease at 2643-Foot Elevation

To evaluate the feasibility of implementing a pulse oximetry screening protocol at a city of mild elevation with a specific focus on the false-positive screening rate. Pulse oximetry screening was performed according to the proposed guidelines endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics at a cent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPediatric cardiology Vol. 34; no. 8; pp. 1803 - 1807
Main Authors Han, Lucy M., Klewer, Scott E., Blank, Karin M., Seckeler, Michael D., Barber, Brent J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.12.2013
Springer
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To evaluate the feasibility of implementing a pulse oximetry screening protocol at a city of mild elevation with a specific focus on the false-positive screening rate. Pulse oximetry screening was performed according to the proposed guidelines endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics at a center in Tucson, AZ, at an elevation of 2,643 ft (806 m). During a 10-month period in 2012, 1069 full-term asymptomatic newborns were screened ≥24 h after birth. The mean preductal oxygen saturation was 98.5 ± 1.3 % (range 92–100 %), and the mean postductal oxygen saturation was 98.6 ± 1.3 % (range 94–100 %). Of 1,069 patients screened, 7 were excluded secondary to protocol violations, and 1 screened positive. An echocardiogram was performed on the newborn with the positive screen, and it was normal with the exception of right-to-left shunting across a patent foramen ovale. The false-positive rate was 1/1,062 or 0.094 %. The pulse oximetry screening guidelines recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics are feasible at an elevation of 2,643 ft (806 m) with a low false-positive rate. Adjustments to the protocol are not required for centers at elevations ≤2,643 ft. Future studies at greater elevations are warranted.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0172-0643
1432-1971
DOI:10.1007/s00246-013-0716-2