Risk of port-site metastases in pelvic cancers after robotic surgery
Abstract Objective To assess the risk of occurrence of port-site metastases after robotic surgery for pelvic cancer. Methods Retrospective study from June 2007 to March 2013 of patients with gynecologic cancer who underwent robot-assisted surgery. We collected preoperative data, including characteri...
Saved in:
Published in | European journal of surgical oncology Vol. 41; no. 4; pp. 599 - 603 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.04.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract Objective To assess the risk of occurrence of port-site metastases after robotic surgery for pelvic cancer. Methods Retrospective study from June 2007 to March 2013 of patients with gynecologic cancer who underwent robot-assisted surgery. We collected preoperative data, including characteristics of patients and FIGO stage, intraoperative data (surgery performed, number of ports), and postoperative data (occurrence of metastases, occurrence of port-site metastases). Results 115 patients were included in the study: 61 with endometrial cancer, 50 with cervical cancer and 4 with ovarian cancer. The surgical procedures performed were: hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, radical hysterectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, para-aortic lymphadenectomy and omentectomy. All surgical procedures required the introduction of 4 ports, 3 for the robot and 1 for the assistant. With a mean follow-up of 504.4 days (507.7 days for endometrial cancer, 479.5 days for cervical cancer, and 511.3 for ovarian cancer), we observed 9 recurrences but no port-site metastasis. Conclusion No port-site metastasis has occurred in our series. However, larger, prospective and randomized works are needed to formally conclude. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0748-7983 1532-2157 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.01.003 |