Risk of port-site metastases in pelvic cancers after robotic surgery

Abstract Objective To assess the risk of occurrence of port-site metastases after robotic surgery for pelvic cancer. Methods Retrospective study from June 2007 to March 2013 of patients with gynecologic cancer who underwent robot-assisted surgery. We collected preoperative data, including characteri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of surgical oncology Vol. 41; no. 4; pp. 599 - 603
Main Authors Seror, J, Bats, A.-S, Bensaïd, C, Douay-Hauser, N, Ngo, C, Lécuru, F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Objective To assess the risk of occurrence of port-site metastases after robotic surgery for pelvic cancer. Methods Retrospective study from June 2007 to March 2013 of patients with gynecologic cancer who underwent robot-assisted surgery. We collected preoperative data, including characteristics of patients and FIGO stage, intraoperative data (surgery performed, number of ports), and postoperative data (occurrence of metastases, occurrence of port-site metastases). Results 115 patients were included in the study: 61 with endometrial cancer, 50 with cervical cancer and 4 with ovarian cancer. The surgical procedures performed were: hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, radical hysterectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, para-aortic lymphadenectomy and omentectomy. All surgical procedures required the introduction of 4 ports, 3 for the robot and 1 for the assistant. With a mean follow-up of 504.4 days (507.7 days for endometrial cancer, 479.5 days for cervical cancer, and 511.3 for ovarian cancer), we observed 9 recurrences but no port-site metastasis. Conclusion No port-site metastasis has occurred in our series. However, larger, prospective and randomized works are needed to formally conclude.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0748-7983
1532-2157
DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2015.01.003