A Prospective Study of Surgical Outcomes and Quality of Life in Severe Foot Trauma and Associated Compartment Syndrome After Fasciotomy
Abstract The purpose of the present prospective study was to analyze the predictors of outcome and review the quality of life of patients who underwent emergency fasciotomy for foot compartment syndrome after blunt trauma. A total of 14 patients were identified and followed for an average of 24 (ran...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of foot and ankle surgery Vol. 54; no. 3; pp. 417 - 423 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.05.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract The purpose of the present prospective study was to analyze the predictors of outcome and review the quality of life of patients who underwent emergency fasciotomy for foot compartment syndrome after blunt trauma. A total of 14 patients were identified and followed for an average of 24 (range 14 to 33) months. The mean interval from initial presentation to decompressive fasciotomy was 5.8 (range 3 to 11) hours. The follow-up data from our patients revealed satisfactory functional and quality of life outcomes, with 11 of 14 (78.6%) able to return to work. Two (14.3%) patients developed claw-toe deformities and 3 (21.4%) patients had sensory deficits directly attributed to compartment syndrome. Finally, 4 (28.6%) patients required modified shoes or shoe inserts for comfortable ambulation. Our findings suggest that earlier fasciotomy results in better quality of life scores, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scale scores, and visual analog scale pain scores and a greater likelihood of being able to wear all shoes comfortably, ambulate independently, and return to work. A shorter interval to fasciotomy, younger age, the absence of bony injury, the absence of other concomitant injuries, and a low velocity crush injury all tended to be predictors of good outcomes at the final review. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1067-2516 1542-2224 |
DOI: | 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.09.015 |