Morphological asymmetry and broiler welfare

Health status, feed conversion ratio, and mortality are long known broiler chicken production indicators. However, further parameters are required by today's demanding meat markets, as these indicators are not sufficiently accurate to determine flock overall welfare. Morphological asymmetry has...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRevista brasileira de ciência avícola Vol. 10; no. 4; pp. 209 - 213
Main Authors Nääs, IA, Sonoda, LT, Romanini, CEB, Morello, GM, Neves, HAF, Baracho, MS, Souza, SRLS, Menezes, AG, Mollo Neto, M, Moura, DJ, Almeida Paz, ICL
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas 01.12.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Health status, feed conversion ratio, and mortality are long known broiler chicken production indicators. However, further parameters are required by today's demanding meat markets, as these indicators are not sufficiently accurate to determine flock overall welfare. Morphological asymmetry has been pointed as an alternative welfare indicator as it reflects the ability of the bird to cope with the challenges that rearing conditions may impose. This study aimed at evaluating the possibility of using morphological asymmetry as a welfare indicator. Broilers from 28 to 42 days of age were used in the trial. Birds were randomly selected in a commercial poultry farm and transported to the laboratory. They walked over the force measurement platform in order to determined their feet force as a percentage of body weight. The following body parts of the live birds were measured by two different operators using a digital caliper: tarsometatarsus length, outertoe length, midtoe length, and backtoe length. In the corresponding carcasses, the following traits were measured: wattle width, eye length, and first secondary feather length. Data were submitted to statistical analyses and no correlation was found between specific feet trait measurements and walking ability. Considering the time budget involved in measuring morphological asymmetry, this procedure did not appear to be a practically feasible welfare indicator.
ISSN:1516-635X
1516-635X
1806-9061
DOI:10.1590/S1516-635X2008000400003