The influence of attitudes and perception of tree benefits on park management priorities

• Published in: Landscape and urban planning Vol. 153; pp. 122 - 128
• Main Authors: Jennings, T.E., Jean-Philippe, S.R., Willcox, A., Zobel, J.M., Poudyal, N.C., Simpson, T.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.09.2016
• Subjects: cities; Diseases; factor analysis; foresters; Landscapes; longevity; Management; outdoor recreation; Parks; Pests; Planting; Priorities; pruning; Public attitudes; public opinion; regression analysis; species diversity; Trees; Urban parks; Urban trees; Visitor satisfaction; wildlife habitats; Tennessee; USA, Tennessee; USA, Tennessee, Oak Ridge; Urban parks; Visitor satisfaction; Public attitudes; Urban trees
• ISSN: 0169-2046; 1872-6062
• DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.021

•Education about park benefits can justify the investment of resources for their management.•Attitudes and values can be obtain form public perception surveys.•Park and recreation research can be obtain to assist in future management program.•iSurvey is a survey beneficial software program to administer surveys in the field. Urban parks are important public resources for outdoor recreation in cities. While the previous studies have concluded that people in general value parks and trees, it is still unclear how public attitudes towards trees and tree-centered management of parks relate to their support for park management priorities, and whether such attitude vary among parks within a city. This study surveyed visitors’ opinion in three parks within the City of Oak Ridge, Tennessee and focused primarily on aspects of park trees to determine what visitors believed should be a future priority for park management. Exploratory factor analysis and multiple regression analysis were employed to data collected from 263 visitors intercepted on site (response rate of 78.5%). Results showed that visitors placed relatively higher preference on planting more trees, increasing species richness and density of trees, than on planting trees in straight rows or pruning or caring. Similarly, visitors placed comparatively higher preference on trees that are native, less hazardous, resistant to pests and diseases, have longer life span, provide shade, wildlife habitat, than those having ability to block out the view of city’s developed landscape. Results also showed that visitors’ personal preference of tree aspects and attitude towards trees significantly affected their support for future tree planting and tree care efforts in city parks. Findings will be useful to city planners, municipal foresters, and landscape designers in understanding public preference for trees and tree-oriented management, and incorporating such information in designing new parks, and enhancing amenity value of existing parks.