Fact-finding survey on the competencies and literacy of radiological technologists regarding radiation disasters

BACKGROUND: Radiological technologists serve as risk communicators who aim to lessen patients’ anxiety about radiation exposure, in addition to performing radiological examinations. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a fact-finding survey on knowledge and awareness of radiation disasters among the radiological...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of X-ray science and technology Vol. 31; no. 2; pp. 237 - 245
Main Authors Arai, Tomohiro, Murata, Syo, Watanabe, Yuichi, Ishihara, Toshihiro, Fukamizu, Yoshiya, Takeda, Satoshi, Ebata, Kiyokadzu, Watanabe, Yuki, Takashima, Yoshio, Kaneko, Junichi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.01.2023
IOS Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND: Radiological technologists serve as risk communicators who aim to lessen patients’ anxiety about radiation exposure, in addition to performing radiological examinations. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a fact-finding survey on knowledge and awareness of radiation disasters among the radiological technologists to reveal their literacy and competencies regarding radiation disasters. METHODS: A paper questionnaire was distributed to 1,835 radiological technologists at 166 National Hospital Organization facilities in Japan. The 28-item questionnaire covered knowledge and awareness of radiation protection and radiation disasters. Radiological technologists were divided into 2 groups by regionality: areas where a nuclear power station was present/nearby (NPS areas) and non-NPS areas. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned from 148 facilities with a facility response rate of 89.2% and from 1,391 radiological technologists with a response rate of 75.8%. There were 1,290 valid responses with a valid response rate of 70.3%. The correct answer rate for knowledge of radiation protection and radiation disasters was high in the 24 NPS areas. There were no differences in awareness of radiation disasters between NPS and non-NPS areas. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing a nationwide, region-independent training system can be expected to improve literacy regarding radiation disasters among radiological technologists. Willingness to assist during disasters was high among radiological technologists irrespective of area, indicating that the competencies of radiological technologists represent a competency model for radiation disaster assistance.
ISSN:0895-3996
1095-9114
DOI:10.3233/XST-221341