Effect of a Safe Patient Handling Program on Rehabilitation Outcomes

• Published in: Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Vol. 94; no. 1; pp. 17 - 22
• Main Authors: Campo, Marc, PT, PhD, Shiyko, Mariya P., PhD, Margulis, Heather, PT, MS, Darragh, Amy R., OTR/L, PhD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 2013
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Algorithms; Chi-Square Distribution; Decision Making; Female; Hospital Units; Humans; Male; Moving and lifting patients; Moving and Lifting Patients - methods; Occupational therapy; Patient Safety; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; Physical therapy techniques; Recovery of Function; Regression Analysis; Rehabilitation; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; safe patient handling; body mass index; Occupational therapy; Physical therapy techniques; SPH; Rehabilitation; Moving and lifting patients; BMI
• ISSN: 0003-9993; 1532-821X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.08.213

Abstract Objective To evaluate the effect of a safe patient handling (SPH) program on rehabilitation mobility outcomes. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting A rehabilitation unit in a hospital system. Participants Consecutive patients (N=1291) over a 1-year period without an SPH program in place (n=507) and consecutive patients over a 1-year period with an SPH program in place (n=784). Interventions The SPH program consisted of administrative policies and patient handling technologies. The policies limited manual patient handling. Equipment included ceiling- and floor-based dependent lifts, sit-to-stand assists, ambulation aides, friction-reducing devices, motorized hospital beds and shower chairs, and multihandled gait belts. Main Outcome Measures The mobility subscale of the FIM. Results Patients rehabilitated in the group with SPH achieved similar outcomes to patients rehabilitated in the group without SPH. A significant difference between groups was noted for patients with initial mobility FIM scores of 15.1 and higher after controlling for initial mobility FIM score, age, length of stay, and diagnosis. Those patients performed better with SPH. Conclusions SPH programs do not appear to inhibit recovery. Fears among therapists that the use of equipment may lead to dependence may be unfounded.