Gantry angle-dependent correction of dose detection error due to panel position displacement in IMRT dose verification using EPIDs

• Published in: Physica medica Vol. 30; no. 2; pp. 209 - 214
• Main Authors: Jin, Guang-hua, Zhu, Jin-han, Chen, Li-xin, Deng, Xiao-wu, Huang, Bo-tian, Yuan, Ke, Liu, Xiao-wei
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Italy Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2014
• Subjects: Dose; Electrical Equipment and Supplies; EPID; IMRT; Mechanical Phenomena; Particle Accelerators; Position displacement; Radiation Dosage; Radiology; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - instrumentation; Reproducibility of Results; Rotation; IMRT; Dose; Position displacement; EPID
• ISSN: 1120-1797; 1724-191X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.05.042

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to measure the mechanical position displacement of three types of electronic portal image device (EPID) panels at different gantry angles and evaluate the impact of positional displacement on intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose verification using an EPID. Methods Three types of linear accelerators and EPIDs (aS500, aS1000 and iViewGT) were used. The portal images were taken every 10° within 360° range. The position coordinate difference between the panel center and the portal film center at different gantry angles was measured, then the mechanical position displacement of EPIDs dependent on the gantry angles was analyzed. For the three linear accelerators and EPIDs, five IMRT plans were measured using EPIDs at 0° gantry angel and at the actual treatment angles. The Gamma technique was used to evaluate the resulted dose difference before and after the corrections of the position displacement by a in-house software. Results For aS500, aS1000 and iViewGT, the maximum mechanical position displacement was 2.9 ± 0.1 mm, 0.2 ± 0.1 mm and 0.1 ± 0.3 mm in the lateral direction and −4.2 ± 0.2 mm, −4.2 ± 0.1 mm and −2.2 ± 0.1 mm in the longitudinal direction, respectively. The position displacement in the longitudinal direction of the three EPIDs can be fitted well with a function. For aS500, aS1000 and iViewGT, the 3%/3 mm gamma pass rates were increased by 6.7%, 2.9% and 0.1% after displacement corrections; and while the 2%/2 mm gamma pass rates were increased by 11.2%, 8.1% and 1.6%. After the displacement correction, there was a slight gamma pass rate difference between the fixed zero degree gantry and the actual treatment angles. Conclusion When the EPIDs were used for IMRT dose verification, there was occasionally large EPID mechanical position displacement, which should be corrected.