Sensory, Shear, and Cooking Properties of Lower-Fat Beef Patties Made with Inner Pea Fiber

ABSTRACT Lower fat (10% and 14%) ground beef patties containing inner pea fiber as dry powder or as part of a high fat mixture were compared to all‐beef patties (10%, 14%, and 18% fat). Patties processed with pea fiber had improved tenderness and cooking yields and showed less change in thickness du...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of food science Vol. 65; no. 5; pp. 805 - 810
Main Authors Anderson, E.T., Berry, B.W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2000
Institute of Food Technologists
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Lower fat (10% and 14%) ground beef patties containing inner pea fiber as dry powder or as part of a high fat mixture were compared to all‐beef patties (10%, 14%, and 18% fat). Patties processed with pea fiber had improved tenderness and cooking yields and showed less change in thickness during cooking, but required longer cooking times to reach 71 °C compared to all‐beef controls. Beef flavor intensity of pea fiber patties did not differ from 10% and 14% fat all‐beef patties. Different forms of pea fiber usage produced similar patty properties. Use of inner pea fiber in lower fat beef patties improved tenderness and cooking yield, without negative effects on juiciness and flavor.
Bibliography:istex:DF685A13688CB1CBDC462895B0013D44545F7F7D
ArticleID:JFDS805
ark:/67375/WNG-0R0FMTLM-F
This research is a contribution to Western Regional Project W‐177. Reference to a brand or trade name does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the U.S. Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center, Natick, Mass. Support from the Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Md., is appreciated. We also thank M. Bigner‐George, P. Chao, T. Nguyen, and Y. Chan for their technical assistance. Address inquiries to Berry (E‐mail
bberry@lpsi.barc.usda.gov
.
ISSN:0022-1147
1750-3841
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb13591.x