Consumer willingness-to-pay for packaging and contents in Asian countries

•WTP for packaging and contents are evaluated.•International comparison is made for the first time.•By knowing the WTP for packaging, we will be better able to choose waste policies. This study was conducted using a hedonic pricing model to evaluate consumer preference for packaging and contents in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWaste management (Elmsford) Vol. 68; pp. 724 - 731
Main Authors Kojima, Risa, Ishikawa, Masanobu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•WTP for packaging and contents are evaluated.•International comparison is made for the first time.•By knowing the WTP for packaging, we will be better able to choose waste policies. This study was conducted using a hedonic pricing model to evaluate consumer preference for packaging and contents in five Asian countries: Japan, Indonesia, Singapore, Taiwan, and China. Results revealed that the marginal rate of substitution (MRS) of packaging for contents differs significantly among countries: 17.7 for Singapore, 8.58 for China, 2.71 for Taiwan, 1.65 for Japan and not significant for Indonesia. Share of Willingness-to-pay (WTP) for packaging accounted for 52.8% of the WTP for sales unit of a representative product in Japan and 46.2% in Taiwan, which were significantly higher than the results for Singapore (32.6%) and China (18.2%). Results showed that the higher the share of packaging in the WTP for a product, the higher the relative packaging weight per unit weight of contents. These results suggest that the relative demand for packaging to contents differs among countries. The results underscore the necessity of choosing suitable policy instruments and marketing strategies for different countries.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0956-053X
1879-2456
DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.042