Noninvasive predictors of esophageal varices in patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis mansoni

•Spleen-based parameters can predict esophageal varices (EV) in hepatosplenic schistosomiasis (HSS).•Spleen stiffness measurement is associated with EV occurrence in HSS.•We proposed a novel score (SSPS) for predicting EV in HSS.•Transient elastography seem more useful than dopplerfluxometry for pre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa tropica Vol. 226; p. 106283
Main Authors Nardelli, Mateus Jorge, Veiga, Zulane da Silva Tavares, Faria, Luciana Costa, Pereira, Gustavo Henrique Santos, da Silva, Catherine Ferreira, Barbosa, Fernanda Aziz, Fernandes, Flávia Ferreira, Perez, Renata de Mello, Villela-Nogueira, Cristiane Alves, Couto, Claudia Alves
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.02.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Spleen-based parameters can predict esophageal varices (EV) in hepatosplenic schistosomiasis (HSS).•Spleen stiffness measurement is associated with EV occurrence in HSS.•We proposed a novel score (SSPS) for predicting EV in HSS.•Transient elastography seem more useful than dopplerfluxometry for predicting EV in HSS. Background: No previous study have evaluated transient elastography for predicting esophageal varices in hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. Aim: To investigate noninvasive methods of predicting esophageal varices in patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis mansoni. Methods: Cross-sectional multicentric study included 51 patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. Patients underwent ultrasonography-dopplerfluxometry, upper endoscopy, complete blood cell count and transient elastography (Fibroscan®) for liver and spleen stiffness measurement (LSM and SSM). Noninvasive scores previously established for cirrhotic population were studied: platelet count to spleen diameter ratio (PSR), LSM-spleen diameter to platelet ratio score (LSPS) and varices risk score (VRS). We proposed a version of LSPS and VRS by replacing LSM with SSM and named them SSPS and modified-VRS, respectively. Results: Esophageal varices were detected in 42 (82.4%) subjects. Individuals with varices presented higher SSM (73.5 vs 36.3 Kpa, p = 0.001), splenic vein diameter (10.8 vs 8.0 mm, p = 0.017), SSPS (18.7 vs 6.7, p = 0.003) and modified-VRS (4.0 vs 1.4, p = 0.013), besides lower PSR (332 vs 542, p = 0.038), than those without varices. SSPS was independently associated with varices presence (OR=1.19, 95%CI 1.03–1.37, p = 0.020) after multivariate analysis. In a model excluding noninvasive scores, SSM was independently associated with varices diagnosis (OR=1.09, 95%CI 1.03–1.16, p = 0.004). AUROC was 0.856 (95%CI 0.752–0.961, p = 0.001) for SSM and 0.816 (95%CI 0.699–0.932, p = 0.003) for SSPS (p = 0.551). Conclusions: Spleen-related variables were predictors of esophageal varices: SSM, splenic vein diameter, SSPS, modified-VRS and PSR. Multivariate models indicated that SSM and SSPS are useful tools for predicting varices in non-cirrhotic portal hypertension by hepatosplenic schistosomiasis and may be used in clinical practice.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0001-706X
1873-6254
1873-6254
DOI:10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.106283