Broad review of four-point probe correction factors: Enhanced analytical model using advanced numerical and experimental cross-examination
[Display omitted] •Extensive review of the four-point probe correction factors.•Improved analytical model based on numerical and experimental cross-examination.•Classic expressions modification for geometrical factors in light of simulations.•Simulated results accuracy is significantly increased by...
Saved in:
Published in | Results in physics Vol. 48; p. 106445 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier B.V
01.05.2023
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2211-3797 2211-3797 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106445 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | [Display omitted]
•Extensive review of the four-point probe correction factors.•Improved analytical model based on numerical and experimental cross-examination.•Classic expressions modification for geometrical factors in light of simulations.•Simulated results accuracy is significantly increased by modified expressions.•Case-study reference method for additional experiments like resistivity checks.
Following a comprehensive top-to-bottom review of the four-point probe’s (4PP) system configurations and usages, an original, cross-checking approach of combining analytical, experimental and numerical methods is presented to serve as a simple unified package for determining electrical resistivity. After a successful comparison based on error analysis between the different results, a robust correction of the analytical model is presented to extract the electrical resistivity from simulations results. Moreover, we present original results from a selection of models and measurements of resistivity applied to germanium samples sharing non-ideal geometries. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2211-3797 2211-3797 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106445 |