Broad review of four-point probe correction factors: Enhanced analytical model using advanced numerical and experimental cross-examination

[Display omitted] •Extensive review of the four-point probe correction factors.•Improved analytical model based on numerical and experimental cross-examination.•Classic expressions modification for geometrical factors in light of simulations.•Simulated results accuracy is significantly increased by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inResults in physics Vol. 48; p. 106445
Main Authors Chelly, Avraham, Glass, Simcha, Belhassen, Jeremy, Karsenty, Avi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.05.2023
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2211-3797
2211-3797
DOI10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106445

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Display omitted] •Extensive review of the four-point probe correction factors.•Improved analytical model based on numerical and experimental cross-examination.•Classic expressions modification for geometrical factors in light of simulations.•Simulated results accuracy is significantly increased by modified expressions.•Case-study reference method for additional experiments like resistivity checks. Following a comprehensive top-to-bottom review of the four-point probe’s (4PP) system configurations and usages, an original, cross-checking approach of combining analytical, experimental and numerical methods is presented to serve as a simple unified package for determining electrical resistivity. After a successful comparison based on error analysis between the different results, a robust correction of the analytical model is presented to extract the electrical resistivity from simulations results. Moreover, we present original results from a selection of models and measurements of resistivity applied to germanium samples sharing non-ideal geometries.
ISSN:2211-3797
2211-3797
DOI:10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106445