Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v

• Published in: Journal of computer assisted tomography Vol. 39; no. 3; p. 443
• Main Authors: Lim, Kyungjae, Kwon, Heejin, Cho, Jinhan, Oh, Jongyoung, Yoon, Seongkuk, Kang, Myungjin, Ha, Dongho, Lee, Jinhwa, Kang, Eunju
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.05.2015
• Subjects: Algorithms; Computer Simulation; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Feedback; Information Storage and Retrieval - methods; Models, Statistical; Phantoms, Imaging; Radiation Dosage; Radiation Protection - methods; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Signal-To-Noise Ratio; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
• ISSN: 1532-3145
• DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000216

The purpose of this study was to assess the image quality of a novel advanced iterative reconstruction (IR) method called as "adaptive statistical IR V" (ASIR-V) by comparing the image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and spatial resolution from those of filtered back projection (FBP) and adaptive statistical IR (ASIR) on computed tomography (CT) phantom image. We performed CT scans at 5 different tube currents (50, 70, 100, 150, and 200 mA) using 3 types of CT phantoms. Scanned images were subsequently reconstructed in 7 different scan settings, such as FBP, and 3 levels of ASIR and ASIR-V (30%, 50%, and 70%). The image noise was measured in the first study using body phantom. The CNR was measured in the second study using contrast phantom and the spatial resolutions were measured in the third study using a high-resolution phantom. We compared the image noise, CNR, and spatial resolution among the 7 reconstructed image scan settings to determine whether noise reduction, high CNR, and high spatial resolution could be achieved at ASIR-V. At quantitative analysis of the first and second studies, it showed that the images reconstructed using ASIR-V had reduced image noise and improved CNR compared with those of FBP and ASIR (P < 0.001). At qualitative analysis of the third study, it also showed that the images reconstructed using ASIR-V had significantly improved spatial resolution than those of FBP and ASIR (P < 0.001). Our phantom studies showed that ASIR-V provides a significant reduction in image noise and a significant improvement in CNR as well as spatial resolution. Therefore, this technique has the potential to reduce the radiation dose further without compromising image quality.