Rigorous modelling and optimization of hybrid separation processes based on pervaporation

Hybrid separation processes are becoming more and more important in the practice if membrane technologies are also involved. In this work, a systematic investigation is completed for three sequence alternatives of distillation and pervaporation. These are the following: pervaporation followed with d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOpen Chemistry Vol. 5; no. 4; pp. 1124 - 1147
Main Authors Koczka, Katalin, Mizsey, Peter, Fonyo, Zsolt
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Versita 01.12.2007
De Gruyter
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Hybrid separation processes are becoming more and more important in the practice if membrane technologies are also involved. In this work, a systematic investigation is completed for three sequence alternatives of distillation and pervaporation. These are the following: pervaporation followed with distillation (PV+D), distillation followed with pervaporation (D+PV), two distillation columns and a pervaporation unit between them (D+PV+D). The hybrid separation process alternatives are evaluated with rigorous modelling tools, but first, a rigorous simulation algorithm is determined for the pervaporation. The three hybrid separation processes are rigorously modelled with CHEMCAD, and optimized with the dynamic programming optimization method for the case of the separation of ethanol-water mixture. The objective function is the total annual cost (TAC). The energy consumption is also investigated. The selection of the ethanol-water mixture has two motivations: (i) it is quite often studied and well known, and (ii) to make biofuel (ethanol) production more economical, membrane technologies might also be applied. The results are compared with each other and with the classical separation completed with heteroazeotropic distillation. The optimized TAC shows that the distillation column followed with pervaporation is the most economical hybrid separation process alternative. Its TAC is about 66% of that of the classical separation.
ISSN:2391-5420
2391-5420
DOI:10.2478/s11532-007-0050-8