Evaluation of satellite precipitation products for water allocation studies in the Sio-Malaba-Malakisi river basin of East Africa
Sio Malaba Malakisi river basin, East Africa. Poor rain-gauge density is a limitation to comprehensive hydrological studies in Sub-Saharan Africa. Consequently, Satellite precipitation products (SPPs) provide an alternative source of data for possible use in hydrological modeling. However, there is...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of hydrology. Regional studies Vol. 39; p. 100983 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier B.V
01.02.2022
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Sio Malaba Malakisi river basin, East Africa.
Poor rain-gauge density is a limitation to comprehensive hydrological studies in Sub-Saharan Africa. Consequently, Satellite precipitation products (SPPs) provide an alternative source of data for possible use in hydrological modeling. However, there is need to test their reliabilities across varied hydro-climatic and physiographic conditions to understand their applicability. Using two approaches, we evaluated the performance of six SPPs against gauge observations for possible water allocation studies in the SMMRB: (i) a point to pixel comparison using different statistical measures; (ii) hydrological evaluation of simulated discharge using the Continuous SEmi-distributed Runoff (COSERO) model approach.
Our results indicate that CHIRPSv2 product performed best followed by MSWEPv2.2 as they suitably detected seasonal and annual rainfall amounts throughout the basin. However, at lower altitudes, most of the products overestimated rainfall as indicated by the performance measures. In some parts of the basin, the COSERO output signify an underperformance by PERSIANN-CDR and a good performance by GPM-3IMERG6. This could be attributed to differences in temporal dynamics of the products. In overall, seasonal trends captured by the SPPs can be used to support catchment management efforts in data scarce regions.
•Evaluating SPPs using ground observed rainfall but also indirectly via COSERO model.•CHIRPSv2 and MSWEPv2.2 perform better in heterogeneous tropical basin terrain.•COSERO model performs well in a tropical basin just like in temperate basins.•Simulations show diverging ETA sums; different parameters compensate for SPP bias. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2214-5818 2214-5818 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100983 |