Epidural recordings in cochlear implant users

• Published in: Journal of neural engineering Vol. 16; no. 5; p. 056008
• Main Authors: Haumann, S, Bauernfeind, G, Teschner, M J, Schierholz, I, Bleichner, M G, Büchner, A, Lenarz, T
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England IOP Publishing 01.10.2019
• Subjects: auditory cortex (AC); auditory evoked potentials (AEPs); cochlear implant (CI); epidural recordings
• ISSN: 1741-2560; 1741-2552
• DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab1e80

Objective. In the long term it is desirable for CI users to control their device via brain signals. A possible strategy is the use of auditory evoked potentials (AEPs). Several studies have shown the suitability of auditory paradigms for such an approach. However, these investigations are based on non-invasive recordings. When thinking about everyday life applications, it would be more convenient to use implanted electrodes for signal acquisition. Ideally, the electrodes would be directly integrated into the CI. Further it is to be expected that invasively recorded signals have higher signal quality and are less affected by artifacts. Approach. In this project we investigated the feasibility of implanting epidural electrodes temporarily during CI surgery and the possibility to record AEPs in the course of several days after implantation. Intraoperatively, auditory brainstem responses were recorded, whereas various kinds of AEPs were recorded postoperatively. After a few days the epidural electrodes were removed. Main results. Data sets of ten subjects were obtained. Invasively recorded potentials were compared subjectively and objectively to clinical standard recordings using surface electrodes. Especially the cortical evoked response audiometry depicted clearer N1 waves for the epidural electrodes which were also visible at lower stimulation intensities compared to scalp electrodes. Furthermore the signal was less disturbed by artifacts. The objective quality measure (based on data sets of six patients) showed a significant better signal quality for the epidural compared to the scalp recordings. Significance. Altogether the approach revealed to be feasible and well tolerated by the patients. The epidural recordings showed a clearly better signal quality than the scalp recordings with AEPs being clearer recognizable. The results of the present study suggest that including epidural recording electrodes in future CI systems will improve the everyday life applicability of auditory closed loop systems for CI subjects.