Resistance to Fracture of Roots Obturated with Novel Canal-filling Systems

Abstract Introduction This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the fracture resistance of roots obturated with various contemporary canal-filling systems. Methods Fifty single-rooted extracted mandibular premolars were decoronated to obtain 13-mm root segments. Ten roots were left unprepared...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of endodontics Vol. 37; no. 11; pp. 1590 - 1592
Main Authors Ghoneim, Angie G., PhD, BDS, MSc, Lutfy, Reem A., PhD, BDS, MSc, Sabet, Nihal E., PhD, BDS, MSc, Fayyad, Dalia M., PhD, BDS, MSc
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Introduction This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the fracture resistance of roots obturated with various contemporary canal-filling systems. Methods Fifty single-rooted extracted mandibular premolars were decoronated to obtain 13-mm root segments. Ten roots were left unprepared and unfilled (negative control). Forty canals were instrumented using 0.06 taper EndoSequence files (Brassler, Savannah, GA). Roots were divided according to the obturating system into 4 groups (n = 10): group 1: iRoot SP sealer (Innovative Bioceramix, Vancouver, Canada) + ActiV GP cone (Brasseler USA, Savanah, GA), group 2: iRoot SP sealer + gutta-percha (GP), group 3: ActiV GP sealer + ActiV GP cone, and group 4: ActiV GP sealer + GP. All groups were obturated using single-cone technique. The roots within each group were embedded in acrylic molds and subjected to the fracture resistance test in which a compressive loading (0.5 mm/min) was applied until fracture. Data were statistically analyzed (analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test). Results The significantly highest fracture resistance was recorded for both the negative control group (381.4 ± 53.2 N) and group 1 (iRoot SP sealer/ActiV GP cone [372 ± 62.9 N]) with no significant difference between them, whereas the significantly lowest value was reported in group 4 (ActiV GP sealer/GP cone [288.3 ± 30.5 N]). Conclusion Bioceramic-based sealer (ie, iRoot SP) is a promising sealer in terms of increasing in vitro resistance to the fracture of endodontically treated roots particularly when accompanied with ActiV GP cones.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0099-2399
1878-3554
DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.008